主页 > 国内 >

怪谈百物语

Dileep Acquitted in 2017 Actor Assault Case As Court Convicts Six Others_我的网站

蜘蛛侠1

A |

随着英国曼彻斯特皇家法院的审判进入最后阶段，30岁的丽贝卡·乔恩斯面临着与两名未成年男生发生性行为的六项重罪指控，她对此均表示不认罪。

B | 此案围绕一位前教师与青少年之间的关系展开，陪审团周五将进行审议，决定其命运。 In a verdict that brings to a close one of the most closely followed criminal trials in Kerala’s recent history, the Principal District and Sessions Court in Ernakulam on Monday acquitted Malayalam actor Dileep in the 2017 case concerning the abduction and sexual assault of a prominent woman actor. The court, presided over by Judge Honey M Varghese, found that the prosecution had failed to substantiate the allegations against Dileep, who was listed as the eighth accused, and against Charlie Thomas, the seventh accused.However, the court convicted six others, including the prime accused Sunil N S, better known as Pulsar Suni, finding them guilty of multiple serious charges including conspiracy, kidnapping, and gang rape. Sentences for the convicted individuals will be pronounced on December 12. In This Article Court Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple ChargesA Case That Shook Kerala’s Film IndustryDileep’s Arrest, Trial, and AcquittalWhat Lies AheadCourt Finds Key Accused Guilty of Multiple Charges The six men convicted in the case are Sunil N S alias Pulsar Suni, Martin Antony, Manikandan B, Vijeesh V P, Salim H alias Vadival Salim, and Pradeep. They were found guilty under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including 120B (criminal conspiracy), 340 (wrongful confinement), 354 (use of criminal force to outrage modesty), 366 (kidnapping), 354B (use of force to disrobe a woman), and 376D (gang rape).The court also found them guilty under relevant sections of the Information Technology Act for filming the sexual assault, an act that added a layer of digital evidence to a case already fraught with emotional and social repercussions.The Sessions Court noted that the evidence presented clearly established the involvement of the first six accused in the crime, while the same could not be said for Dileep and Charlie Thomas. The judge stated that the prosecution was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Dileep had played any role in planning or abetting the crime. A Case That Shook Kerala’s Film Industry The incident dates back to February 17, 2017, when the survivor, a well-known Malayalam actor, was abducted while travelling to a film shoot in Thrissur. She was allegedly confined inside a moving vehicle and subjected to sexual assault, with the ordeal recorded by the perpetrators on camera.The case sent shockwaves through Kerala and the wider film industry, not only for the nature of the crime but also for the stature of the accused and the victim. The survivor’s courage in pursuing justice inspired widespread conversations about safety, gender dynamics, and accountability in the entertainment world.The first major breakthrough came the day after the incident, when the police arrested Martin Antony, the driver of the vehicle. Within a week, the alleged mastermind Pulsar Suni was also taken into custody. By the end of that month, four more individuals had been arrested, marking a swift initial phase of the investigation.Suni, the first accused, remained in custody for over seven years before being granted bail by the Supreme Court in 2024. Throughout this period, he consistently maintained that he had acted on someone else’s instructions, though his claims remained mired in contradictions and speculation. Dileep’s Arrest, Trial, and Acquittal Dileep’s arrest in July 2017 marked a dramatic turning point in the case. The actor was accused of conspiring to orchestrate the crime as an act of revenge following personal disputes involving his then-wife. His arrest divided public opinion in Kerala, leading to polarised debates and protests across the state.The actor’s first two bail pleas were rejected by the Kerala High Court, citing the gravity of the charges and the need for a thorough investigation. He was eventually granted bail in October 2017 after spending 83 days in judicial custody.The trial officially commenced in 2020 and continued for nearly five years. During the proceedings, more than 200 witnesses were examined, and hundreds of documents were submitted as evidence. Despite the extensive nature of the trial, the court ultimately ruled that the prosecution’s case against Dileep lacked sufficient evidence for conviction.For Dileep, who remains one of Malayalam cinema’s biggest stars, the verdict marks the end of a prolonged legal and public ordeal. The actor had consistently maintained his innocence, claiming he had been falsely implicated. What Lies Ahead While the judgment has acquitted Dileep, it does not necessarily bring the legal proceedings to a full stop. The survivor retains the right to appeal the verdict before the Kerala High Court, which could reopen judicial scrutiny into the alleged conspiracy.The case remains a defining chapter in Kerala’s cultural and judicial narrative, one that tested the state’s legal system and its society’s response to crimes against women. As the dust settles, the conversation around justice, gender, and accountability in Malayalam cinema is far from over.Also Read: Dileep’s ‘Prince And Family’ Cleared For Release With A U Certificate。

在过去数日的法庭审理中，陪审员们深入了解了这位教师的心理状况及据称与青少年发生的多起性接触事件，证据与辩词交织，引人深思。尤其引人注目的是，乔恩斯与第二名所谓的受害者，即未公开身份的男孩B，育有一女。

情感纠葛与信物。

C | 陪审团得知，乔恩斯曾向一名青少年寄送了一封充满激情的情书，称其为“我所梦想的一切”。检察官Joe Olman在庭上朗读了这封信的部分内容，信中乔恩斯表达了对16岁男孩B的深情：“你的每一寸都是完美，你是我所有愿望的实现。”乔恩斯承认，尽管她与男孩B发展了感情并在其离校后怀上了他的孩子，但她否认在其就读高中期间与其有染。

男孩B则声称，两人在他尚为小学生时便已发生关系，且描述了包括亲吻在内的亲密互动。此外，双方还因未出生孩子的未来产生争执，乔恩斯被指威胁称若男孩B结束关系，她将自残甚至自杀，让孩子成为他的责任。

社交媒体的秘密交流。乔恩斯承认通过Snapchat与15岁的男孩A秘密沟通，而这一行为及其与男孩B的类似交流均瞒着双方家长。

D | 男孩们与她之间存在明显的暧昧，如男孩A称呼她为“性感”，而男孩B的信息内容则更为露骨。乔恩斯在庭上坦承，作为专业教师，她不应涉足此类交流，对此她负有责任。

奢侈礼物与约会之夜。法庭透露，乔恩斯赠予男孩A一条价值345英镑的Gucci腰带，并被监控录像捕捉到与他在特拉福德中心购买该物品的画面，检方视此为“诱骗”行为的一部分。此外，她还策划了一场包含性暗示刮刮卡、玫瑰花瓣和隐藏字条的“约会之夜”与男孩B共度，最终以宣布怀孕的消息作为“惊喜”，这一系列行为突显了双方关系的复杂与不当。

失去一切的代价。乔恩斯在庭上哭泣着讲述自己刚出生的女儿在24小时内被带走的经历，她每周仅有三次、每次三小时的探访权。她身着粉色婴儿帽出现在法庭，以此象征对孩子的思念，否认此举是为了博取陪审团同情，强调这是她与女儿情感联系的一种方式。